ArticlePloS one2026
Trends in river herring environmental DNA in two North Carolina river systems.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
River herring (Blueback Herring [Alosa aestivalis] and Alewife [A. pseudoharengus]), were once abundant in North Carolina waters and were an economically important commercial fishery. Both populations have declined in recent history due to habitat loss, overfishing, and river alterations. Eastern North Carolina's turbid and large river systems make traditional sampling difficult; thus, a rapid and accurate method for quantifying spawning populations is needed. The use of environmental DNA (eDNA) to detect river herring has been successfully applied to other watersheds across the Atlantic Coast. To determine if eDNA techniques could be applied to turbid watersheds to monitor river herring movement during the spawning season, weekly water sampling was performed at eight sites along the Neuse and Tar-Pamlico Rivers in North Carolina. Sampling for eDNA at two locations along the Neuse River were conducted in tandem with traditional electrofishing surveys to compare trends in river herring abundance between methods. The results indicate that both river herring eDNA concentrations and fish counts using electrofishing increased in the first three weeks of the spawning season. During the second half of the spawning season, eDNA concentrations remained high while fish abundances decreased. These results suggest that eDNA may be more consistent with electrofishing early in the spawning season while it may detect eDNA from juveniles, larvae, and persistent ambient eDNA later in the spawning season after adults have left the system. Sampling multiple locations along the rivers also indicated that the eDNA trends were consistent between different river systems. Sampling location where eDNA was collected mattered, as sites further upriver were more consistent in eDNA trends between river systems, and are likely better for long-term monitoring, compared to downstream locations. The results of this work help lay the foundation for the application of eDNA for future monitoring efforts in turbid waters, including North Carolina watersheds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.