Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081458›Full record

ReviewPsychopathology2026

Islands of Inference: A Neurodevelopmental Architecture for Fixed Delusions.

Paul Goldsmith

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychopathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Paul GoldsmithInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College, Level 1, Faculty Building, London, UK, p.goldsmith@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

<p>Background: Delusions can be strikingly selective: individuals may hold highly elaborated, unshakeable beliefs in one domain while remaining otherwise cognitively intact. Models emphasising dopaminergic salience or belief-updating failures account for the intensity and persistence of delusions but struggle to explain their circumscribed nature. Summary: This paper develops a conceptual framework that complements dominant functional accounts. Subtle neurodevelopmental variation in cortical micro-architecture, as commonly occurs, may give rise to focal cortical regions ("islands") with greater representational depth than their surrounding networks. When such a region supports high-order social inference - particularly advanced theory of mind - it may generate internally coherent narratives that exceed the integrative capacity of neighbouring circuits. These inferences cannot be adequately contextualised, simulated, or revised by the broader network and therefore become fixed. The "Islands of Inference" model accounts for several core features of schizophrenia, including the social content of delusions, their typical onset in late adolescence, their resistance to counter-evidence, and their progression over time. It also clarifies the distinct roles of dopamine and cannabis: neuromodulators amplify the influence of the island's output without determining its content. Finally, the framework clarifies implications for empirical investigation. During delusional thought, focal regions within the mentalising network should support deeper internal representations than their surrounding circuits, even when those neighbouring areas are active and coherent. Key Messages: This framework reframes delusions as reflecting a failure of architectural constraint rather than global cognitive dysfunction and suggests new directions for empirical investigation and treatment. </p>.

Indexed as

DelusionsSchizophreniaTheory of MindHumansNeurodevelopmentDelusionsPhenomenologyPsychopathologySchizophreniaTheory of mind

Identifiers

PMID42081458
PMCPMC13327662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.