Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081293›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2026

Transplantation of human stem cell-derived cone photoreceptors partially restores vision in aged rd1 mice with advanced retinal degeneration.

Christopher A Procyk, Anna Melati, Menahil Tariq, Jingshu Liu, Matthew J Branch, Jamie D Delicata, Philippa Harding, Mahmoud Khazim, Majid Moshtagh Khorasani, Bryan Ladino and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Christopher A ProcykOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Anna MelatiOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Menahil TariqOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Jingshu LiuOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Matthew J BranchOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Jamie D DelicataOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Philippa HardingOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Mahmoud KhazimOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Majid Moshtagh KhorasaniOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Bryan LadinoOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Emily P LanningOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Miriam MargariOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Ifrax MahamoudOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Christi MofidiOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Krunal Narendra KumarOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Salome Van HeerdenOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Alexander J SmithOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Emma L WestOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Robin R AliOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.
Rachael A PearsonOcular Cell and Gene Therapy Group, King's College London Centre for Gene Therapy and Regenerative Medicine, Guy's Hospital, London, SE1 9RT, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1107-1969

Funding

Medical Research Council UK MR/R015651/1Medical Research Council UK MR/T002735/2Medical Research Council UK MR/V030191/1Medical Research Council UK MR/V038559/1Medical Research Council UK UKRI3826
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted photoreceptor replacement therapy is a promising, potentially disease-agnostic approach for reversing sight-loss associated with advanced retinal degenerations, including age-related macular degeneration. We have previously shown that transplantation of human stem cell-derived cone photoreceptors (hCones) into young adult (3-month-old) mouse models of advanced retinal degeneration can restore retinal function. However, substantial remodeling of the remaining inner retinal circuitry continues long after complete photoreceptor loss, raising the critical question of whether photoreceptor transplantation can effectively rescue function at very late-stage degeneration. rd1 mice received transplants at 12-15 months of age and were examined ∼3 months later. Transplanted hCones survived in large numbers, while host inner retinal neurons exhibited significant plasticity, extending dendrites to transplanted hCones, and making synapse-like contacts. Host Müller glia undergo notable remodeling, apparently incorporating the donor cells within the retinal structure. Multielectrode array recordings showed robust rescue of light-evoked activity across the normal photopic range intensities and evidence of inner retinal processing, while some treated mice showed improvements in visually evoked optokinetic head tracking behavior. Together, these data indicate that effective rescue following photoreceptor replacement therapy is feasible long after complete photoreceptor loss and extensive inner retinal remodeling.

Indexed as

Retinal Cone Photoreceptor CellsRetinal DegenerationStem CellsStem Cell TransplantationVision, OcularAgingAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansMiceconemacular degenerationorganoidretinatransplantation

Identifiers

PMID42081293
PMCPMC13312030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.