Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081271›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia open2026

KCNQ2 neonatal epilepsy: Impact of prompt diagnosis and treatment, and early predictors of outcome severity.

Trupti Jadhav, Sophie E Bouffler, Emily Innes, Michael Fahey, Matthew Hunter, Kavitha Kothur, Sebastian Lunke, Matthew Lynch, Emma Macdonald-Laurs, Elizabeth Emma Palmer and 8 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Trupti JadhavDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5338-800X
Sophie E BoufflerAustralian Genomics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4749-4883
Emily InnesKids Neuroscience Centre, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-0040
Michael FaheyDepartment of Pediatric Neurology, Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0811-4785
Matthew HunterDepartment of Pediatrics, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2475-6545
Kavitha KothurKids Neuroscience Centre, Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0109-8877
Sebastian LunkeVictorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7168-0723
Matthew LynchNeurosciences Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-8231
Emma Macdonald-LaursDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-4610
Elizabeth Emma PalmerCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-215X
Chirag PatelGenetic Health Queensland, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6374-5224
Jason PinnerCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8323-1802
Kate RineyNeurosciences Unit, Queensland Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1122-3555
Rani SachdevCentre for Clinical Genetics, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2750-1430
Sarah A SandaraduraKids Neuroscience Centre, Children's Hospital at Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1393-8148
Ingrid E SchefferDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2311-2174
Zornitza StarkAustralian Genomics, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-1371
Katherine B HowellDepartment of Neurology, The Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5469-8411

Funding

Medical Research Futures Fund, Genomics Health Futures Mission GHFM76747Queensland GenomicsRoyal Children's Hospital Foundation 2020-1259
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether prompt genetic diagnosis in children with KCNQ2 neonatal epilepsy enabling targeted therapy is associated with improved outcomes, and identify early predictors of developmental outcomes.

methodsThirty-seven children with KCNQ2 neonatal epilepsy were recruited from five pediatric centers. We reviewed demographic, clinical, EEG, and genetic data. We determined differences in outcomes between individuals with prompt (greater than 30 days from seizure onset) and later genetic diagnosis, and we identified neonatal factors associated with developmental outcome.

resultsBaseline characteristics were similar between children with prompt (n = 6, median age at genetic diagnosis 15 days) and later (n = 31, median age 309 days, p < .05) diagnosis. All with prompt diagnosis received sodium channel blocking (SCB) anti-seizure medication (ASM) in the neonatal period compared with 15/31 (48%) in the later diagnosis group. Children with prompt diagnosis had higher rates of seizure freedom at age 12 months than those with later diagnosis (6/6 [100%] vs. 17/31 [54%]; p .049], and lower number of emergency department representations (median 0 vs. 2), and hospital readmissions (median 0 vs. 1). Factors in the neonatal period associated with abnormal developmental outcome included neurological abnormalities (e.g., abnormal tone) and markedly abnormal neonatal EEG background (11/11 [100%] with markedly abnormal EEG vs. 11/24 [46%] with normal to moderately abnormal EEG). SIGNIFICANCE: Prompt genetic diagnosis was associated with targeted therapy, resulting in improved seizure control and reduced hospital representation. Clinical features present in the neonate assist in predicting outcome severity, which is critically important in counselling families receiving a KCNQ2 diagnosis soon after seizure onset. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: In KCNQ2 neonatal epilepsy, sodium channel blocking antiseizure medicines are recommended, but the benefits of starting treatment early have been uncertain. Our findings show that prompt genetic diagnosis enabled early targeted treatment, with potential to improve outcomes. Specifically, prompt genetic diagnosis was associated with improved seizure control and reduced hospital visits compared with delayed diagnosis. However, a prospective, long-term study is needed to determine whether early treatment also improves developmental outcomes. Predicting outcome severity in newborns remains challenging, although abnormal neurological examination and markedly abnormal EEG in the newborn period were linked to abnormal developmental outcomes.

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsEpilepsyEpilepsy, Benign NeonatalKCNQ2 Potassium ChannelSodium Channel BlockersElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeAnticonvulsantsKCNQ2 Potassium ChannelKCNQ2 protein, humanSodium Channel BlockersKCNQ2neonatal epilepsyoutcomeprompt genetic diagnosissodium channel blocking antiseizure medication

Identifiers

PMID42081271
PMCPMC13238869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.