Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081255›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2026

MRI Deep Learning for Differentiating Glioblastoma, IDH Wild-type from Central Nervous System Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Mana Moassefi, Paul A Decker, Gian Marco Conte, Matthew L Kosel, Annette M Molinaro, Moritz A Niederschweiberer, Yalda Nikanpour, Michael W Ruff, Terry C Burns, Umar Farooq and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Mana MoassefiDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-0111-7791
Paul A DeckerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-3756-4227
Gian Marco ConteDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-5926-7517
Matthew L KoselDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0008-5787-0134
Annette M MolinaroDepartment of Neurologic Surgery, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-9854-7404
Moritz A NiederschweibererDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-0234-1701
Yalda NikanpourDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0009-0005-9430-5722
Michael W RuffDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8513-9615
Terry C BurnsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-7633-3045
Umar FarooqDivision of Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-7891-9891
Colin DerdeynDepartment of Radiology and Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-5932-2683
Thomas M HabermannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3532-9132
James R CerhanDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-7482-178X
Jeremy D W GreenleeDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-8481-8517
Matthew A HowardDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0003-3935-8889
Susan L SlagerDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-5173-4712
Rachael A VaubelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8842-5975
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-694X
Daniel H LachanceDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-8653-2259
Bradley J EricksonDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-7926-6095
W Oliver TobinDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-8141-2394
Jeanette E Eckel-PassowDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-1114

Funding

National Institutes of Health (NIH) CA97274National Institutes of Health (NIH) NS113803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM), isocitrate dehydrogenase wild-type (IDHwt) and central nervous system diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (CNS-DLBCL) are aggressive brain tumors with overlapping MRI features, yet distinct treatment approaches. Noninvasive tools are needed to aid in differential diagnosis. Deep learning on T1 postcontrast and T2-weighted MRI sequences were used to differentiate GBM and CNS-DLBCL. A three-stage temporal study design was utilized. Model development was performed on 146 patients with CNS-DLBCL and 146 age-matched, sex-matched, and MRI year-matched patients with GBM diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 1998 and 2019. Models were tested on independent temporal test cohorts. Initial testing included 240 independent GBM diagnosed at Mayo Clinic between 1998 and 2019. The prospective test cohort included 37 patients with CNS-DLBCL and 256 patients with GBM diagnosed at Mayo Clinic after January 1, 2020, and 36 patients with CNS-DLBCL diagnosed at an external institution. Of the patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic, 47% had MRIs generated from non-Mayo institutions. Two different model approaches were compared: (i) ensemble approach using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and cross-validation for model selection and (ii) loss approach minimizing cross-entropy loss and cross-validation to evaluate prediction performance. The AUCs on the prospective test cohort were 0.84 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.78-0.90] and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.88) for the ensemble and loss approaches, respectively. Stability of ensemble prediction improved with the increasing number of models. Stratified AUC analysis demonstrated consistent performance across sex and age. We utilized a robust temporal study design and applied 2 different analytic approaches to develop a classification model. The findings confirm the feasibility of using MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate GBM from CNS-DLBCL. SIGNIFICANCE: GBM, IDHwt and CNS-DLBCL are aggressive brain tumors with overlapping MRI features, yet distinct treatment approaches. Noninvasive tools are needed to aid in differential diagnosis. We developed MRI-based deep learning models to differentiate GBM, IDHwt from CNS-DLBCL using a rigorous three-stage temporal design that included prospective validation. The model AUC on a prospective cohort was 0.84.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCentral Nervous System NeoplasmsDeep LearningGlioblastomaLymphoma, Large B-Cell, DiffuseMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdultAgedDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID42081255
PMCPMC13188832

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.