ArticleJAMA network open2026
Extended Endocrine Therapy and Survival for Breast Cancer Subtypes in Premenopausal Patients.
Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Premenopausal patients with node-positive, hormone receptor-positive, early breast cancer derive benefit from extended endocrine therapy (EET) following 5 years of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonist-based treatment. The benefit of EET may differ according to surrogate breast cancer subtypes in postmenopausal patients. Objective: To evaluate the risk of invasive and distant recurrence across all surrogate breast cancer subtypes among patients with node-positive, hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer who remained premenopausal after completing 5 years of adjuvant therapy with an LHRH agonist who received and did not receive EET. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter cohort study conducted in the United States and Italy used data from 2 prospectively maintained datasets: the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study and the European Institute of Oncology Breast Cancer cohort. Eligible patients were diagnosed with early breast cancer at 40 years of age or younger between January 2005 and December 2016, had node-positive hormone receptor-positive disease, and remained premenopausal after 5 years of adjuvant LHRH agonist therapy with no evidence of recurrence. Median (IQR) follow-up was 7.3 (4.9-10.3) years. Data were analyzed June 2025. Exposure: EET (with tamoxifen monotherapy, LHRH agonist plus tamoxifen, or LHRH agonist plus aromatase inhibitor), irrespective of the duration of EET, measured at study baseline (defined as the first day of the sixth year after the initiation of adjuvant ET). Main Outcomes and Measures: Invasive breast cancer-free survival and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) distributions were estimated using the adjusted Kaplan-Meier method among patients with or without the exposure, weighted through propensity score (PS) weighting analysis, with the scientific approach. Results: In total, 487 patients were included (median [IQR] age at diagnosis, 37 [35-39] years in the EET group and 37 [33-39] years in the no EET group), and 276 received EET for a median (IQR) duration of 3.7 (2.2-5.0) years. Overall, 89 patients (18%) had luminal A-like disease, 298 (61%) had luminal B-like disease, and 100 (21%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-positive disease. The PS-weighted hazard ratio (HR) for invasive breast cancer-free survival comparing the EET with the no EET group was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.32-1.45) in luminal A-like, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.40-1.00) in luminal B-like/ERBB2-negative, and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.21-1.87) in ERBB2-positive subgroups. The cause-specific PS-weighted HR for DRFS was 0.25 (95% CI, 0.08-0.75) in luminal A-like, 0.54 (95% CI, 0.32-0.94) in luminal B-like/ERBB2-negative, and 0.54 (95% CI, 0.12-2.53) in ERBB2-positive subgroups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, a lower estimated risk with EET use was observed across all surrogate breast cancer subtypes. However, the lower estimated risk was greatest among patients with luminal A-like disease, a finding that warrants confirmation in larger, prospective cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.