Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081241›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Appendiceal Adenocarcinoma Cytoreduction Outcomes and Perioperative Serum Tumor Marker Levels.

Vinay K Pattalachinti, Ashlee Seldomridge, Abdelrahman Yousef, Mahmoud Yousef, Eleanor A Fallon, Jacquelyn McCullough, Betul Beyza Gunes, Yun Song, Christopher P Scally, Paul Mansfield and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Vinay K PattalachintiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Ashlee SeldomridgeDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Abdelrahman YousefDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Mahmoud YousefDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Eleanor A FallonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Jacquelyn McCulloughDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Betul Beyza GunesDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Yun SongDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Christopher P ScallyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Paul MansfieldDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Michael G WhiteDepartment of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Keith F FournierDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
Beth A HelminkDepartment of Surgical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.
John Paul ShenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Appendiceal adenocarcinoma (AA) is a rare gastrointestinal cancer that frequently presents with peritoneal metastases; the standard of care for resectable peritoneal metastases from AA limited to the peritoneum is cytoreductive surgery (CRS) followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Three serum tumor markers (TMs)-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), and cancer antigen 125 (CA125)-may play a role in preoperative and postoperative risk estimation and decision-making in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC. Objective: To evaluate the association of preoperative and postoperative serum TM levels with outcomes in patients with AA or goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) undergoing CRS-HIPEC. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a single quaternary referral cancer center. Software was used to query the MD Anderson internal patient database of patients with AA or GCA to identify a cohort receiving CRS with or without HIPEC between March 2016 and August 2024, with median postoperative follow-up of 35.6 months (range, 1.4-100.5 months). Data were analyzed from June 2024 to March 2025. Exposure: Preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125. Main Outcomes and Measures: Association of preoperative and postoperative serum TM levels with tumor burden and likelihood of complete CRS, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 421 CRSs were included in the study, 376 (89.3%) of which were performed in patients with AA (229 [60.9%] in females; median age at surgery, 56 [IQR, 47-64] years; 290 [77.1%] were complete CRS). In AA, greater vs lesser preoperative tumor burden was associated with increased median serum TM levels (CEA: 9.5 [IQR, 3.7-42.3] ng/mL vs 3.0 [IQR, 2.1-5.9] ng/mL; CA19-9: 31.1 [IQR, 10.0-102.3] U/mL vs 15.0 [IQR, 6.1-25.5] U/mL; CA125: 28.7 [IQR, 13.9-58.5] U/mL vs 11.5 [IQR, 8.0-17.3] U/mL; all P < .001), and after CRS vs before, percentages of patients with TM elevation were significantly lower (CEA: 77 of 223 [34.5%] vs 222 of 340 [65.3%]; CA19-9: 45 of 194 [23.2%] vs 117 of 324 [36.1%]; CA125: 13 of 203 [6.4%] vs 98 of 325 [30.2%]; all P < .001). However, complete vs incomplete CRS was associated with normalized TM levels in a greater percentage of patients (55 of 90 [61.1%] vs 7 of 52 [13.5%]; P < .001). Elevated vs normal preoperative TM levels were associated with increased rate of incomplete CRS (30 of 193 [15.5%] vs 1 of 95 [1.1%]; P < .001) and shorter DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.30; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64; P < .001) but not shorter OS (HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.71-2.60; P = .36). Postoperative TM elevation was associated with shorter DFS (HR, 3.73; 95% CI, 2.33-5.95; P < .001) and OS (HR, 4.10; 95% CI, 2.02-8.31; P < .001) in univariate analyses and also in multivariate analyses (HR, 3.34; 95% CI, 1.44-7.75; P = .005), whereas postoperative normalization of all TMs was associated with improved DFS (HR, 3.54; 95% CI, 2.01-6.23; P < .001) and OS (HR, 6.00; 95% CI, 2.06-17.46; P = .001) in univariate analyses and also in multivariate analyses (HR, 4.21; 95% CI, 1.33-13.35; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of CRS in patients with AA, elevated serum TM levels were associated with worse outcomes, suggesting that patients with postoperative TM elevation after complete CRS may represent a cohort with residual tumor that requires more cautious surveillance and that both preoperative and postoperative levels of CEA, CA19-9, and CA125 should be assessed in clinical practice.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAppendiceal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresPeritoneal NeoplasmsAdultAgedCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenFemaleHumansHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyMaleMembrane ProteinsMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorCA-125 AntigenCA-19-9 AntigenCarcinoembryonic AntigenMembrane ProteinsMUC16 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID42081241
PMCPMC13139952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.