ArticleCurrent medical science2026
Integrated DNA Repair Capacity and NER Gene Expression for Improving Risk Prediction in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Article in Current medical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveDNA repair plays a critical role in the development of smoking-related cancers. We hypothesized that DNA repair capacity (DRC) and nucleotide excision repair (NER) mRNA expression are associated with increased head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) risk in the Chinese population.
methodsWe conducted a case-control study including 349 patients with HNSCC and 316 cancer-free controls. DRC and NER mRNA expression levels were measured in lymphoblastoid cells exposed to benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide (BPDE). Correlations between DRC and NER mRNA expression were analyzed, and their associations with HNSCC risk were evaluated.
resultsThe mean DRC was significantly lower in patients with HNSCC (9.72% ± 2.25%) than in healthy controls (10.81% ± 2.63%, P < 0.001). Compared with individuals with higher DRCs, those with lower DRCs had a significantly greater risk of HNSCC (odds ratio [OR] = 2.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.60-3.10, P < 0.001; P
conclusionsSuboptimal DRC and reduced expression of key NER genes, particularly XPA and XPB, are associated with increased HNSCC risk. Integrating these two NER biomarkers may provide a novel and improved model for HNSCC risk assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42081182What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.