Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081180›Full record

ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2026

To treat or not to treat? Impact of hygienization on the microbiological safety of frass from black soldier fly larvae and yellow mealworm production aimed for fertilizer use.

Ann De Volder, Lotte Frooninckx, David Deruytter, Johan Ceusters, Dries Vandeweyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ann De VolderResearch Group for Insect Production and Processing (IP&P), Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), KU Leuven, Geel Campus, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440, Geel, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6564-1309
Lotte FrooninckxCenter of Expertise Sustainable Biomass and Chemistry, Thomas More University of Applied Sciences, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440, Geel, Belgium.
David DeruytterInsect Research Center Inagro, Ieperseweg 87, 8800, Rumbeke-Beitem, Belgium.
Johan CeustersResearch Group for Sustainable Crop Production and Protection (SusCroPP), Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Geel Campus, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440, Geel, Belgium.
Dries VandeweyerResearch Group for Insect Production and Processing (IP&P), Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems (M2S), KU Leuven, Geel Campus, Kleinhoefstraat 4, 2440, Geel, Belgium. dries.vandeweyer@kuleuven.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6240-0796

Funding

VLAIO-TETRA ValoReSect Project HBC.2021.0103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustainable expansion of the insect farming industry requires valorization of the generated frass, a by-product with fertilizer and soil improver potential. Commercialization is currently restricted by Regulation (EU) No 2021/1925, considering insect frass as animal manure and imposing a pathogen-reducing heat treatment. This study investigated the microbiological safety of frass from industrial black soldier fly larvae (BSFL) and yellow mealworm (YM) production, untreated and hygienized by drying, pelleting or composting. Results showed that despite high microbial counts for both viable cells and aerobic endospores, Salmonella spp. were absent in untreated frass, Escherichia coli counts were low compared to other manure types, while the number of Enterococci was similar. The hygienisation procedures induced little change in the total number of viable cells and aerobic endospores and exerted more impact on temperature-sensitive Enterobacteriaceae compared to more tolerant Enterococcaceae. Drying, pelleting and composting were not equally suited for hygienization of frass from both insect species due to differences in initial microbial load and physical composition. Generally, it could be concluded that YM frass will meet the EU microbiological criteria more easily than BSFL frass and may even do so without hygienization. In case hygienization is necessary, reduction of the number of E. coli by the applied treatment will be the factor determining regulation compliance. Compared to Enterococcaceae, E. coli abundance in frass is lower and the species is more efficiently reduced. Oven drying is suited for both BSFL and YM frass but is expensive as it requires an external heat source. Pelleting seems applicable to YM frass, BSFL frass requires preliminary heating to reduce its moisture content. Composting of BSFL frass may produce a safe product if temperatures reached throughout the process are high enough. Composted YM frass can be considered microbiologically more unstable/unsafe than untreated YM frass, due to water addition at the process start. It may be concluded that flexibility in treatment procedures for insect frass, aimed for use as fertilizer, can be allowed. Microbiological safety is ensured after reference treatment (70 °C–60 min) but can also be achieved after milder processing or even without treatment, which would reduce costs and preserve frass quality.

Indexed as

E. coliEnterococaceaeHermetia illucensHygienizationInsect rearing residueSalmonellaTenebrio molitor

Identifiers

PMID42081180
PMCPMC13139546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.