Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081177›Full record

ReviewDrug delivery and translational research2026

Cellulose and its potential applications in skin biology; a comprehensive review.

Aasia Hameed, Adnan Haider, Hussain Mustatab Wahedi

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drug delivery and translational research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Aasia HameedDepartment of Biomedicine, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences & Technology, Sector H-12, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan.
Adnan HaiderDepartment of Biotechnology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, 46000, Pakistan. adnan.haider@numspak.edu.pk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-4754
Hussain Mustatab WahediDepartment of Biomedicine, Atta-ur-Rahman School of Applied Biosciences, National University of Sciences & Technology, Sector H-12, Islamabad, 44000, Pakistan. hmwahedi@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-4978

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellulose is the most abundant natural biopolymer obtained from plants, animals, and microbes. Cellulose is porous, biocompatible, biodegradable, noncytotoxic, and can retain water for a longer period. Therefore, cellulose has various applications in the medical, cosmetic, paper, and food industries. The current review summarizes the recent progress related to the application of cellulose in skin biology. Cellulose is preferable for skin biology applications due to its porosity, and hygroscopic nature that enables it to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of native skin. Cellulose can be modified by combining with other biopolymers to make a functional cellulose composite. Researchers have developed various cellulose composites that are successfully used as wound dressing agents, scaffolds for skin tissue engineering, and vehicles for drug delivery like anticancer or other hydrophobic drugs. Cellulose-based facial masks act as a carrier for active agents like anti-aging, anti-wrinkle, and anti-acne substances. Cellulose can also be used as a stabilizer in the preparation of emulsion-based creams and other cosmetic products. It is concluded that cellulose is a suitable biopolymer in the global marketplace for skin applications, but further advancements should be made to maximize its clinical use.

Indexed as

CelluloseSkinAnimalsBandagesDrug Delivery SystemsHumansTissue EngineeringCelluloseBiopolymersCelluloseDrug deliveryFacial masksSkin tissue engineeringWound dressing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.