ReviewOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2026
The Evolving Landscape of Vision Rehabilitation: Current Status and Future Directions.
Review in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vision impairment is increasingly recognised as a complex condition shaped not only by ocular pathology but also by cognitive, psychological, social and environmental factors that influence participation and quality of life. In line with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, contemporary vision rehabilitation frameworks adopt a biopsychosocial perspective that extends beyond treatment of the eye condition alone toward holistic support to improve the lives of individuals with vision loss. An overview of the effectiveness and future directions of multidisciplinary vision rehabilitation in clinical practice is presented, and a summary of the findings concerning the international standards of vision rehabilitation, focusing on adults. Furthermore, some examples of achievements in emerging fields are presented, such as neuroplasticity and visual system recovery, technological interventions and psychosocial support, including their future directions. Multidisciplinary models are widely supported but remain difficult to implement because of limited resources, workforce constraints and differences in culture and health policy. Overcoming these barriers is critical to expanding and strengthening multidisciplinary vision rehabilitation. The evidence highlights the need for implementation-focused research, closer collaboration across disciplines and core outcome measures that capture participation, mental health and quality of life, not just impairment. The overview also points to the importance of structured models that integrate neurorehabilitation (artificial intelligence-based) technology and mental healthcare while adapting to regional and cultural contexts. Embedding multidisciplinary vision rehabilitation within health systems is both a clinical necessity and a prerequisite for advancing global commitments to inclusion and equity for people with vision impairment. As population ageing and global demographic change are expected to increase the absolute numbers of adults with vision loss, strengthening collaboration between research, clinical practice and service delivery will be essential to further improve the quality of life of individuals with vision loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42081173What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.