ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Supervised Learning for Collagen Segmentation in Bright-Field Histology: A Comparative Evaluation of U-Net and MLP.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeQuantifying collagen in histological slides is essential for diagnosing and monitoring fibrosis. However, the combination of PicroSirius Red staining with polarized light microscopy, one of the standard techniques, requires expensive equipment and time-consuming procedures. This study investigated whether supervised machine learning algorithms applied to bright-field images could provide an automated and accurate method for collagen segmentation, reducing the dependence on polarized imaging.
methodsA total of 140 histological images of renal, cardiac, and tendinous tissues from mice and rats stained with PicroSirius Red were analyzed. The images were fragmented into smaller patches, and the green channel was selected for non-polarized analysis. The reference standard was generated from polarized images binarized using ImageJ. Two supervised models were evaluated: (1) a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) trained using five features (RGB intensities, median filter, and Wavelet), and (2) a U-Net architecture adapted to the image dimensions.
resultsBoth models performed well, with the best results observed in rat tendon samples (Dice and precision > 80%). Performance was lower in mouse kidney images, possibly due to weaker staining and thinner collagen fibers. Overall, the MLP slightly outperformed the U-Net, which still showed comparable results.
conclusionThe proposed methodology proved effective for collagen segmentation highlighting the potential of supervised learning to reduce costs and processing time in histological analysis. Future improvements include expanding the dataset and refining the reference standard to enhance robustness in biological tissue evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42081149What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.