Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081149›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026

Supervised Learning for Collagen Segmentation in Bright-Field Histology: A Comparative Evaluation of U-Net and MLP.

Evelyn R Silva, Lívia B Souza, Fernanda S Tenorio, Nilsa R Damaceno-Rodrigues, Rita C Marqueti, Karina R Casali, Tatiana S Cunha, Matheus C Moraes

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Evelyn R SilvaInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, Brazil. evelyn.rocha@unifesp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9681-0520
Lívia B SouzaDepartment of Medicine, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6014-5808
Fernanda S TenorioInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1966-3384
Nilsa R Damaceno-RodriguesInstitute of Medical Research, Laboratory of Cell Biology - LIM 59, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4287-9167
Rita C MarquetiLaboratory of Molecular Analysis, Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Faculty of Health Sciences and Technologies, University of Brasilia, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9126-3882
Karina R CasaliInstitute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8281-0135
Tatiana S Cunha *Institute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9070-1414
Matheus C Moraes *Institute of Science and Technology, Federal University of São Paulo, São José dos Campos, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6019-6653

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 443992/2023-1Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 33009015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeQuantifying collagen in histological slides is essential for diagnosing and monitoring fibrosis. However, the combination of PicroSirius Red staining with polarized light microscopy, one of the standard techniques, requires expensive equipment and time-consuming procedures. This study investigated whether supervised machine learning algorithms applied to bright-field images could provide an automated and accurate method for collagen segmentation, reducing the dependence on polarized imaging.

methodsA total of 140 histological images of renal, cardiac, and tendinous tissues from mice and rats stained with PicroSirius Red were analyzed. The images were fragmented into smaller patches, and the green channel was selected for non-polarized analysis. The reference standard was generated from polarized images binarized using ImageJ. Two supervised models were evaluated: (1) a Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) trained using five features (RGB intensities, median filter, and Wavelet), and (2) a U-Net architecture adapted to the image dimensions.

resultsBoth models performed well, with the best results observed in rat tendon samples (Dice and precision > 80%). Performance was lower in mouse kidney images, possibly due to weaker staining and thinner collagen fibers. Overall, the MLP slightly outperformed the U-Net, which still showed comparable results.

conclusionThe proposed methodology proved effective for collagen segmentation highlighting the potential of supervised learning to reduce costs and processing time in histological analysis. Future improvements include expanding the dataset and refining the reference standard to enhance robustness in biological tissue evaluation.

Indexed as

Collagen segmentationFibrosisMachine learningMLPU-Net

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.