ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Chronic optic neuropathy: correlating MR imaging features and etiology.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeChronic optic neuropathy (CON) represents a final common pathway of sustained optic nerve injury from diverse etiologies, yet characteristic MRI features and their clinical correlations are not well defined. This study evaluated the predominant MR imaging findings of non-compressive CON and correlated these patterns with underlying clinical etiologies. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively identified 186 patients with MRI reports referencing chronic optic neuritis or neuropathy from 2009 to 2024. Of these, 162 met inclusion criteria, defined as high-resolution orbital MRI and ophthalmologic confirmation of CON. Three reviewers assessed optic nerve caliber, T2/FLAIR signal abnormality, and post-contrast enhancement. Ophthalmologic records were reviewed to determine clinical laterality and etiology.
resultsAmong 162 patients, 66 (40.7%) demonstrated bilateral and 96 (59.3%) unilateral MRI findings. The predominant imaging pattern across etiologies was optic nerve atrophy (< 3 mm) with increased T2/FLAIR signal, present in 125 patients. Enhancement was rare (n = 7). Laterality mismatches were frequent: 42 patients (25.9%) demonstrated bilateral MRI findings despite unilateral clinical involvement, while 13 (8.0%) had bilateral clinical disease with unilateral imaging abnormalities. The leading etiologies were multiple sclerosis (20.0%), glaucoma (16.7%), unspecified optic neuritis (13.0%), and post-traumatic injury (5.5%). Across all etiologies, chronic changes were characterized by atrophy with or without T2/FLAIR hyperintensity. Enhancement, when present, was associated with recent or subacute demyelination.
conclusionOptic nerve atrophy with increased T2/FLAIR signal and absent enhancement constitutes the dominant MRI pattern of non-compressive CON, most likely reflecting chronic axonal degeneration rather than active inflammation. These findings reliably indicate chronic optic nerve injury but have limited specificity for etiology. Frequent imaging and clinical laterality discrepancies suggest subclinical or asymmetric disease. MRI should therefore be interpreted in conjunction with ophthalmologic evaluation when determining the underlying cause of CON.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42081096What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.