ArticlePsychological research2026
Shifting and zooming through space … or not: The role of attention in spatial compatibility tasks - A replication of Stoffer (1991).
Article in Psychological research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The mechanism of spatial coding involved in the Simon effect remain debated, with two prominent theories - the attention-shifting account Stoffer, (Psychological Research, 53(2), 127-135, 1991) and the referential coding account Hommel, (Psychological Research, 55(3), 208-222, 1993b) - offering competing explanations why the irrelevant stimulus-location is coded. To date, neither account can fully explain all available empirical data. Most published studies rely on limited sample sizes, which constrains statistical power and leaves the field without conclusive evidence. This study directly replicated Stoffer's (Psychological Research, 53(2), 127-135, 1991) investigation into attentional subprocesses that generate the Simon effect. We manipulated target spatial position across two reference frames: a global frame based on target's screen side and a local frame defined by the relative position within each screen side, allowing us to test for both global and local Simon effects. Targets were presented inside precues, either a large box or two small boxes, which were presented simultaneously with or sequentially before the target. With an adequately-powered sample, our study revealed concurrent global and local Simon effects - a result different from Stoffer's original findings. Only the local Simon effect varied with precue type and simultaneous or sequential target presentation. These results clarify the conditions under which attentional shifting and referential coding mechanisms contribute to different Simon effects, demonstrating that when spatial target positions are defined by both global and local reference frames, these mechanisms shape the emergence of distinct Simon effects in different ways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.