Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42081039›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Performance of a tracked ultrasound navigation setup for pediatric tumor surgery: a phantom study.

V J van Boheemen, J M van der Zee, M A J Hiep, M Fitski, M H W A Wijnen, F J Siepel, A F W van der Steeg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

V J van BoheemenPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J M van der ZeePrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M A J HiepDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M FitskiPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M H W A WijnenPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F J SiepelRobotics and Mechatronics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
A F W van der SteegPrincess Maxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands. a.f.w.vandersteeg@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.

Funding

KWF Kankerbestrijding 16145
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeResecting pediatric tumors is often surgically challenging caused by insufficient tumor localization, due to limited visibility and palpability. Surgical navigation systems may potentially improve intraoperative tumor localization. This study evaluates the accuracy and precision of an in-house developed navigation setup using tracked ultrasound under standardized conditions.

methodsBone surface-based registrations, using automatic bone segmentation on tracked ultrasound images, were conducted on phantoms to validate the performance of the in-house developed surgical navigation setup. Registration was conducted on different phantoms, consisting of tumors near bones of an extremity (n = 50), the pelvis (n = 5) and the thoracic wall (n = 5). In addition, the same registration framework was evaluated in the case of kidney tumors, where the kidney surface was used instead of the bone surface for registration. Target registration error (TRE) was used as the primary outcome measure.

resultsFor tumors localized with bone surface-based registration, the setup achieved a median TRE of 1.3 mm with an interquartile range (IQR) of 0.9-2.1 mm. The robustness of the bone surface registration method was demonstrated with consistent results across anatomical regions. For kidney tumor localization with kidney surface-based registration, the setup achieved a median TRE of 3.3 mm with an IQR of 2.7-3.6 mm.

conclusionUnder controlled circumstances, the navigation setup demonstrated reproducible < 2 mm accuracy for tumor localization using the bone surface registration. For kidney tumors, the navigation setup showed < 4 mm accuracy. These findings establish a performance benchmark that can guide interpretation of larger inaccuracies encountered during clinical use and support future development toward clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Bone segmentationElectromagnetic trackingPhantomRegistrationSurgical navigationTracked ultrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.