SynthesisPediatric surgery international2026
Total versus partial fundoplication in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review and comparative meta-analysis of 2633 patients highlighting the trade-off between reflux control and postoperative dysphagia.
Synthesis in Pediatric surgery international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common condition in children requiring surgical intervention when medical therapy fails. Nissen (total) and Toupet (partial) fundoplications are the most frequently performed antireflux procedures; however, their comparative effectiveness and safety in the pediatric population remain uncertain.
methodsA systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from database inception to 2025. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing total and partial fundoplication in patients younger than 18 years with GERD. Pooled risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects models in R software.
resultsEighteen studies including 2,633 children were analyzed. Total fundoplication was associated with a significantly higher risk of postoperative dysphagia compared with partial fundoplication (RR 1.69; 95% CI 1.07-2.68; p = 0.024; I²=12%; n = 1,154), corresponding to an absolute risk increase of 5.7% and a number needed to harm (NNH) of 17. No significant difference was observed in reflux recurrence (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.21-2.42; p = 0.59; I²=71% n = 834), although event rates were numerically lower after total fundoplication (6.8% vs. 13.7%), corresponding to an absolute risk reduction of 6.9% (NNT = 15). Intraoperative complications (RR 1.11; p = 0.84), postoperative complications (RR 1.49; p = 0.12), reoperation rates (RR 0.95; p = 0.88), and mortality (RR 1.09; p = 0.74) were comparable between procedures.
conclusionsTotal and partial fundoplication demonstrate similar effectiveness for reflux control and overall safety in pediatric GERD. However, total fundoplication is associated with a higher risk of postoperative dysphagia, suggesting that partial fundoplication may offer functional advantages in selected patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42080999What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.