Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080953›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie2026

Perceptions of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Fertility Postponement: Limited Evidence, Critical Questions.

Marie-Caroline Compans, Ester Lazzari, Eva Beaujouan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marie-Caroline CompansWittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital - IIASA, OeAW, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. marie-caroline.compans@ined.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1469-976X
Ester LazzariWittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital - IIASA, OeAW, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8789-4681
Eva BeaujouanWittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital - IIASA, OeAW, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3072-4336

Funding

H2020 European Research Council 101001410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of women using medically assisted reproduction (MAR) is rising in high-income countries. This trend is partly driven by the tendency to delay childbearing, yet infertility treatments cannot compensate for the decrease in reproductive capacity with age. Scholars are currently concerned that the increasing availability of MAR is fuelling the misconception that it can extend reproductive life. High confidence in the success of MAR later in life would then encourage fertility postponement. However, this assumption remains untested, likely due to limited data availability. We examine this using panel survey data from the National Survey of Fertility Barriers, conducted in the United States in 2004-2007 and 2007-2010. Our findings support the technological salience hypothesis, which states that perceptions of MAR would only influence fertility intentions at ages when women are more likely to experience difficulties conceiving. Specifically, women aged 35 or over who have high confidence in the success of MAR when used in the late 30s are less likely to forego childbearing than those with low confidence. Overall, however, perceptions of MAR play a limited role in explaining fertility decisions compared to other socio-demographic characteristics. Nonetheless, taking them into account improves our understanding of how technologies enter the realm of reproductive decision-making, particularly at less fertile ages. In conclusion, we highlight the need for further data collection on this issue, covering more recent periods and countries where births are delayed and MAR availability is increasing.

Indexed as

Fertility intentionsFertility postponementMedically assisted reproductionUS

Identifiers

PMID42080953
PMCPMC13447613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.