Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080935›Full record

Observational studyBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026

[Medical students in hospital emergency preparedness in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative analysis of the ESCAPE study].

Lucien Torlot, Johanna Huber, Carla Nau, Franziska Jahns, Bernhard Zwißler, Martin R Fischer, Ines Schroeder, PREPARED Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Observational study in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lucien TorlotKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. Lucien.torlot@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Johanna HuberInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
Carla NauKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Franziska JahnsKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Deutschland.
Bernhard ZwißlerKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
Martin R FischerInstitut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, München, Deutschland.
Ines SchroederKlinik für Anaesthesiologie, LMU Klinikum, LMU München, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.
PREPARED Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitals should plan a staffing surge capacity to prepare for a new pandemic or disaster. As medical students are a possible surge capacity resource, this study investigated whether including students in surge capacity plans is desirable and under which conditions it is feasible.

methodsWe performed two retrospective multicentre observational trials in 2023 by enrolling medical students from 20 German faculties and leadership from critical areas of inpatient care at two university hospitals. We investigated the integration of medical students in the COVID-19 effort, assessed the willingness to include students in future preparedness plans, and explored possible requirements for such a deployment.

resultsBoth leadership staff (n = 72) and students (n = 1249) displayed a clear willingness for cooperation in the context of preparedness plans (81.9% and 90.8% approval respectively). Most agreed on delegating diagnostic, medical assistance, nursing and logistical tasks to the surge capacity help force. Students addressed financial compensation, clearance of academic obligations and sufficient training as prerequisites for their deployment. Leadership staff also emphasized the need for adequate training. Both parties cited students' academic obligations amongst the main limiting factors.

conclusionBoth surveys display a high acceptance for including students into the surge capacity workforce. These results support the need for predefined roles for surge capacity helpers and emphasize the necessity of pre-emptive preparedness training and the clarification of academic obligations ahead of time.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsStudents, MedicalSurge CapacityGermanyHumansLeadershipPandemic PreparednessRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Emergency preparednessHospitalsHospital volunteersSurge capacityWorkforce

Identifiers

PMID42080935
PMCPMC13212819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.