ReviewSkeletal radiology2026
Imaging findings of foot and ankle injuries in dancers.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Dancers are performing artists and elite athletes with unique physiological and psychological demands. Many dance styles, especially classical ballet, require extraordinary flexibility and strength throughout the foot and ankle with remarkable pain tolerance. Injuries arising from biomechanical and metabolic stresses negatively impact career progression with resultant chronic pain, permanently impaired function, and financial loss. Therefore, dancers rarely seek medical attention except for genuine problems. The unique demands of dance can result in specific injuries and distinctive radiological patterns on imaging. Early and accurate recognition of these dance-specific findings is essential in diagnosing the dancer's foot and ankle. Given the dancer's unique needs and high risk of injury, this manuscript will discuss essential radiologic considerations specific to foot and ankle imaging in the dancer. Key points include the need for weightbearing radiographs, applications for weightbearing computed tomography, indications for ultrasound when magnetic resonance imaging is generally the gold standard, and the value of dancer-specific imaging techniques. An emphasis is placed on recognizing pathology that is genuinely unique to this patient cohort such as flexor hallucis longus tendinopathy, low-risk stress fractures at the second metatarsal base, and spiral fractures at the fifth metatarsal diaphysis. Understanding the degree of correlation between imaging findings with symptoms and clinical diagnoses is essential. Identifying common and uncommon injury patterns in dancers coupled with a knowledge of the implications of these injuries can facilitate improved communication with referring providers, which may help radiologists contribute to providing optimal patient care for a vulnerable patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42080902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.