ArticleNeuro-oncology2026
Nuclear export as a therapeutic vulnerability in ZFTA-RELA ependymoma.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
34 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEpendymoma (EPN) is the third most common pediatric brain tumor with no targeted therapies available to patients. In supratentorial ependymoma, the most frequent driver alteration is a gene fusion between ZFTA and RELA (denoted ZR), leads to constitutive localization of ZR in the nucleus. Because ZR is not currently druggable, we tested whether ZR expression leads to aberrant protein interactions that could represent therapeutic vulnerabilities.
methodsUsing CRISPR-Cas9 pooled screening, we identified many novel druggable ZR interacting proteins including XPO1, CARM1, SMARCA4, and CDK1. We focused on the nuclear export protein (XPO1), given the ability of most XPO1 inhibitors (i.e. Selinexor) to cross the blood brain barrier, FDA approval, and documented safety profiles in children.
resultsWe found that specific nuclear ZR levels are needed for cell proliferation and are regulated by XPO1. Increased ZR accumulation in the nucleus does not increase oncogenic gene expression but drives tumor cells out of cell cycle, as compared to a defective ZR DNA binding mutant. Treatment of ZR driven patient-derived mouse models with Selinexor impairs cell growth and extends survival of animals in vivo. The combination of Selinexor treatment with Gemcitabine and Ribociclib (used in a clinical trial for relapsed EPN at St Jude Children's Research Hospital (SJDAWN)) further extends mouse survival.
conclusionOur findings demonstrate that ZR interacting proteins constitute therapeutic leads, and that XPO1 is critical for titrating 'goldilocks' levels of ZR nuclear expression. We identify a novel combination therapy of Selinexor, Gemcitabine, and Ribociclib that may be immediately translated into clinical trials for EPN patients that are currently without targeted treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.