ArticleLasers in surgery and medicine2026
1726-nm Laser Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Tunnels in a Pediatric Skin of Color Patient: Clinical and Ultrasound Outcomes.
Article in Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 1726-nm Laser Treatment of Hidradenitis Suppurativa Tunnels in a Pediatric Skin of Color Patient: Clinical and Ultrasound Outcomes.Lasers in surgery and medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the safety, tolerability, and early clinical and ultrasound effects of a 1726-nm laser for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) tunnels in a pediatric patient with skin of color. MATERIALS AND
methodsA 16-year-old female (Fitzpatrick skin type VI) with moderate HS and bilateral axillary draining tunnels underwent 4 monthly treatments with a 1726-nm laser (22-24 J/cm²) directed only to the right axillary tunnel. The patient was receiving concurrent adalimumab therapy throughout the treatment period. Outcomes included investigator-rated Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS), patient-reported drainage, flare frequency, and pain (0-10 visual analog scale), as well as standardized photography and high-frequency ultrasound imaging performed at baseline and through week 15.5.
resultsBy week 15.5, VSS of the treated right axilla improved from 9 to 2, primarily reflecting improved scar pliability (4 to 1). Drainage of the treated tunnel resolved after the first laser session and did not recur. In contrast, the untreated left axillary tunnel remained chronically draining. Ultrasound imaging of the treated side demonstrated a reduction in tunnel dimensions over time. Treatment was well tolerated, with a mean pulse-associated pain score of 3/10 that resolved immediately post-procedure, and no adverse events were observed.
conclusionTreatment with a 1726-nm laser was associated with early resolution of drainage, improved scar pliability, and reduced tunnel dimensions on ultrasound. Although interpretation is limited by concurrent biologic therapy, the early unilateral response supports a localized laser effect. Larger controlled studies with longer follow-up are warranted to clarify the role of 1726-nm laser therapy in the management of HS tunnels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.