Observational studyTranslational vision science & technology2026
Dome-Shaped Protrusions on Descemet's Membrane in Bullous Keratopathy: Identification and Histopathological Examination.
Observational study in Translational vision science & technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To identify structural alterations of Descemet's membrane (DM) in bullous keratopathy (BK) and to explore their association with intracellular dark endothelial spots (IDESs) observed by specular microscopy. Methods: This multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 75 eyes that underwent endothelial keratoplasty for corneal endothelial dysfunction. Based on preoperative clinical diagnosis, eyes were classified as having Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD)-related or non-FECD BK. DM specimens were collected during endothelial keratoplasty and analyzed as flat-mounted preparations using phase-contrast microscopy. IDESs were evaluated preoperatively by masked assessment using specular microscopy. Results: Among the 75 eyes, 25 were clinically diagnosed with FECD. Of the remaining 50 eyes with BK, 15 showed no characteristic histological abnormalities, 11 exhibited guttae-like changes, and 24 demonstrated a distinct and previously unrecognized DM alteration, termed dome-shaped protrusions (DSPs). Specular microscopy images suitable for IDES evaluation were available in a subset of cases. IDESs were detected in 10 of 18 DSP-positive eyes and in 1 of 10 DSP-negative eyes, indicating a significant association between DSPs and IDESs (odds ratio 11.25; P < 0.05). Conclusions: DSPs represent a distinct structural alteration of the DM in non-FECD BK and are significantly associated with IDESs observed by specular microscopy. These findings provide insight into the heterogeneity of endothelial failure in BK and suggest a link between clinical imaging findings and underlying DM morphology. Translational Relevance: Dome-shaped protrusions provide a histopathological correlate for intracellular dark endothelial spots observed by specular microscopy and may support improved phenotyping of endothelial dysfunction in non-Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy bullous keratopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.