ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
False-Positive High-Sensitivity Troponin I in Clinical Practice.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) is essential for diagnosing myocardial infarction, however, false-positive results can significantly influence clinical management. CASE SERIES SUMMARY: Over 13 months, 11 patients at a regional Queensland hospital showed elevated hs-cTnI without supportive clinical or imaging evidence of myocardial infarction. Validation using i-STAT point-of-care testing and formal interference studies confirmed all results as false positives. DISCUSSION: In a setting without onsite cardiac services, analytical accuracy is critical. False-positive troponin results may trigger incorrect diagnoses, anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy, interfacility transfers, invasive procedures, hospitalization, and heightened patient anxiety, all with significant implications for patient safety, resource use, and health care costs. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: False-positive hs-cTnI results continue to represent a significant diagnostic challenge in the era of advanced analytical assays. Clinicians should remain vigilant when laboratory findings conflict with clinical presentations. Targeted interference investigations and confirmation through alternative assay platforms can mitigate organizational and patient risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.