Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080782›Full record

ArticleJACC. Case reports2026

Mahaim Tachycardia Mimicking Ventricular Tachycardia.

Karapet Davtyan, Arpi Topchyan, Ekaterina Bazaeva, Hakob Brutyan

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karapet DavtyanDepartment of Cardiac Rhythm and Conduction Disorder, National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Arpi TopchyanDepartment of Cardiac Rhythm and Conduction Disorder, National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia. Electronic address: atopchyan5@gmail.com.
Ekaterina BazaevaDepartment of Cardiac Rhythm and Conduction Disorder, National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.
Hakob BrutyanDepartment of Cardiac Rhythm and Conduction Disorder, National Medical Research Center for Therapy and Preventive Medicine, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAtypical accessory pathways can closely mimic the electrocardiographic features of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia from the tricuspid annulus. CASE SUMMARY: A 39-year-old man with a history of previous unsuccessful radiofrequency ablation for a presumed diagnosis of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia presented with symptomatic wide QRS complex tachycardia. A subsequent redo procedure using high-density mapping revealed the true arrhythmia mechanism to be an atypical Mahaim pathway with no discernible atrial insertion. DISCUSSION: The misdiagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia often results in failed ablation attempts. High-density mapping plays a pivotal role in redefining the arrhythmia substrate, uncovering the true mechanism, and guiding effective ablation; it should be recommended, especially in redo procedures. TAKE-HOME MESSAGES: The origin of some atypical Mahaim pathways can be distinctly subvalvular, rather than purely annular. High-density mapping is essential for a comprehensive evaluation of the subvalvular apparatus. Identification of a broad earliest activation site at specific anatomical locations should prompt a more rigorous investigation into the underlying electrophysiologic mechanism.

Indexed as

case reportelectroanatomical mappingelectrophysiologyMahaim pathwayradiofrequency ablationventricular tachycardia

Identifiers

PMID42080782
PMCPMC13244030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.