Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080739›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2026

Comparative Evaluation of the New HIV VIDAS® DUO AG/AB Assay With DUO Ultra on Well Characterized Participants From the HIV-1 Acute Infection French ANRS PRIMO Cohort.

Gilbert Mchantaf, Xavier Maia, Valérie Andriantsoanirina, Océane Dehan, Karl Stefic, Laurent Hocqueloux, Olivier Robineau, Alain Makinson, Cécile Goujard, Laurence Meyer and 2 more

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Analytical and Clinical Performance of VIDASDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gilbert MchantafCHU d'Orléans, Virologie, Orléans, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-0492
Xavier MaiaUniversité d'Orléans, LI2RSO, Orléans, France.
Valérie AndriantsoanirinaAP-HP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Océane DehanCHU d'Orléans, Virologie, Orléans, France.
Karl SteficUniversité de Tours, INSERM U1259, CHRU de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9686-9194
Laurent HocquelouxUniversité d'Orléans, LI2RSO, Orléans, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2264-4822
Olivier RobineauHôpital Guy Chatiliez, Tourcoing, France.
Alain MakinsonInfectious Diseases Department & INSERMU1175, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
Cécile GoujardINSERM CESP U1018, Université Paris Saclay, Paris, France.
Laurence MeyerAP-HP, Hôpital Bicêtre, Santé Publique, Paris, France.
Véronique Avettand-FenoelCHU d'Orléans, Virologie, Orléans, France.
ANRS PRIMO cohort

Funding

ANRS-MIE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosing HIV-1 infection as early as the primary infection is crucial. In this context, we performed a comparative evaluation and agreement analysis of the newly proposed serological assay for the combined detection of total antibodies against HIV and P24 antigen (HIV VIDAS® DUO AG/AB, bioMérieux®), with the previously available HIV VIDAS® DUO Ultra assay in the well characterized acute-HIV-infection multicentric ANRS-CO-06-PRIMO Cohort in classification of Fiebig stages combined with confirmatory testing. Samples collected on the day of enrollment in the cohort, between April 2024 and June 2025, were analyzed with both serological assays. We also performed a recency infection assay, an HIV-1 westernblotting and the measurement of HIV-RNA. Acute infection was classified according to Fiebig stages and compared between both assays. All samples (n = 77) were positive with both assays. One major discordance was noted, with a positive antigen and a negative antibody reaction with DUO AG/AB, with an opposite configuration with DUO Ultra. A high proportion of not determinable signals (26% to 68%) was noted with both assays, prompting a difficulty in classifying acute infection stages in the absence of confirmatory assays. The high rate of not determinable signals especially with P24 antigen with both assays demonstrated in our study, could prompt a difficulty in acute infection classification according to Fiebig.

Indexed as

HIV-1HIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHIV Core Protein p24HIV InfectionsAdultCohort StudiesFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedRNA, ViralSensitivity and SpecificitySerologic TestsHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHIV Core Protein p24RNA, Viralagreement analysisFiebig classificationHIV‐1 acute infectionHIV‐1 diagnosisHIV 4TH Generation ELISA test

Identifiers

PMID42080739
PMCPMC13138282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.