ArticleJournal of medical virology2026
Comparative Evaluation of the New HIV VIDAS® DUO AG/AB Assay With DUO Ultra on Well Characterized Participants From the HIV-1 Acute Infection French ANRS PRIMO Cohort.
Article in Journal of medical virology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analytical and Clinical Performance of VIDASDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Diagnosing HIV-1 infection as early as the primary infection is crucial. In this context, we performed a comparative evaluation and agreement analysis of the newly proposed serological assay for the combined detection of total antibodies against HIV and P24 antigen (HIV VIDAS® DUO AG/AB, bioMérieux®), with the previously available HIV VIDAS® DUO Ultra assay in the well characterized acute-HIV-infection multicentric ANRS-CO-06-PRIMO Cohort in classification of Fiebig stages combined with confirmatory testing. Samples collected on the day of enrollment in the cohort, between April 2024 and June 2025, were analyzed with both serological assays. We also performed a recency infection assay, an HIV-1 westernblotting and the measurement of HIV-RNA. Acute infection was classified according to Fiebig stages and compared between both assays. All samples (n = 77) were positive with both assays. One major discordance was noted, with a positive antigen and a negative antibody reaction with DUO AG/AB, with an opposite configuration with DUO Ultra. A high proportion of not determinable signals (26% to 68%) was noted with both assays, prompting a difficulty in classifying acute infection stages in the absence of confirmatory assays. The high rate of not determinable signals especially with P24 antigen with both assays demonstrated in our study, could prompt a difficulty in acute infection classification according to Fiebig.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.