Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080663›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2026

Dominance and toxicity without lethality: Exploring biomass, cyanometabolites, and Daphnia responses across Cyanobacterial strains.

Łukasz Wejnerowski, Tamara Dulić, Sultana Akter, Michał Rybak, Agnieszka Piasecka, Jakub Szymkowiak, Oskar Kamiński, Anna Czerepska, Filip Pniewski, Zorica Svirčev and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Łukasz WejnerowskiDepartment of Hydrobiology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2690-4302
Tamara DulićBiochemistry and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8296-1638
Sultana AkterBiotechnology, Department of Life Technologies, Faculty of Technology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1939-7963
Michał RybakDepartment of Water Protection, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7957-184X
Agnieszka PiaseckaDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5686-886X
Jakub SzymkowiakForest Biology Center, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4595-1876
Oskar KamińskiDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0635-9248
Anna CzerepskaDepartment of Hydrobiology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.
Filip PniewskiDepartment of Marine Ecosystems Functioning, Faculty of Oceanography and Geography, University of Gdańsk, Gdynia, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0313-6627
Zorica SvirčevDepartment of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8355-7661
Ewa PonieckaRiver Ecosystems Laboratory, Alpine and Polar Environmental Research Center, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Sion, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0772-8630
Krzysztof ZawieruchaDepartment of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Institute of Environmental Biology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0754-1411
Katarzyna TaylorDepartment of Gene Expression, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3219-6872
Marcin Krzysztof DziubaDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1803-4164
Jussi MeriluotoBiochemistry and Cell Biology, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6300-301X

Funding

Narodowa Agencja Wymiany Akademickiej PPN/BEK/2020/1/00241Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2022/04/Y/NZ8/00092Narodowe Centrum Nauki UMO-2020/39/D/NZ8/02436Novo Nordisk Fonden NNF21OC0071323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cyanobacteria are cosmopolitan, important components of biomass with a remarkable ability to synthesize a diverse array of bioactive compounds, some of which may have toxic effects on other organisms and ecosystems. In this study, filamentous cyanobacterial strains isolated predominantly from temperate European freshwaters (Aphanizomenon, Chrysosporum, Cuspidothrix, Dolichospermum, Planktothrix, Raphidiopsis), with a subset from Arctic waters (Microcoleus, Phormidesmis), were qualitatively screened for commonly studied cyanometabolites, using immunoassays and chromatographic techniques. We also assessed the effects of culture extracts and filtrates on the survival of Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulicaria. The results indicated a broad capacity among tested strains to produce toxic and bioactive compounds. Specifically, we detected anabaenopeptins, anatoxin-a, cylindrospermopsin, microcystins, and saxitoxins. Although numerous strains showed the potential to produce a variety of toxic and bioactive compounds and reached high biomass after 40 days of incubation, their extracts and filtrates frequently had negligible negative effects on the survival of Daphnia. In contrast, significant lethality was observed in response to planktic Limnothrix sp. and glacial Microcoelus autumnalis that tested negative for the studied compounds, as well as for an Aphanizomenon klebahnii strain in which only anabaenopeptins were detected. We also observed a positive relationship between the biomass used to prepare cyanobacterial extracts and Daphnia survival, and this result raises the question of whether there is a trade-off between the growth rates of strains and their toxicities. Our study extends the current knowledge of the geographical distribution of toxic cyanobacteria and suggests that some of them may also produce other, yet unidentified toxic compounds.

Indexed as

Bacterial ToxinsCyanobacteriaDaphniaDaphnia magnaDaphnia pulexAlkaloidsAnimalsBiomassCyanobacteria ToxinsMicrocystinsTropanesAlkaloidsanatoxin aBacterial ToxinsCyanobacteria ToxinsmicrocystinMicrocystinsTropanesaquatic ecosystemscyanobacterial bloomscyanotoxinseutrophicationextremophilesHPLC‐MStoxicity assays

Identifiers

PMID42080663
PMCPMC13280780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.