Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080590›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Comprehensive evaluation of artificial intelligence-empowered approaches for protein-aptamer complex prediction.

Jiani Zhao, Kha Tram, Hongbin Yan, Yifeng Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiani ZhaoDepartment of Computer Science, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, L2S 3A1 Ontario, Canada.
Kha TramCytodiagnostics Inc., 919 Fraser Dr Unit 11, Burlington, L7L 4X8 Ontario, Canada.
Hongbin YanDepartment of Chemistry, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, L2S 3A1 Ontario, Canada.
Yifeng LiDepartment of Computer Science, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, L2S 3A1 Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4873-6928

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) - John R. Evans Leaders Fund 42115Canada Research Chair ProgramCEWIL Canada Innovation Hub programNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN 2021-03879NSERC Undergraduate Student Research Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug discovery is a time-consuming, expensive, and high-risk process. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled major breakthroughs in small-molecule and protein therapeutics. However, AI-driven design of aptamer drugs remains largely unexplored. Aptamers are short (15-100 nt) single-stranded DNAs or RNAs that exhibit high binding affinity, high specificity, and low immunogenicity, making them promising candidates for disease (such as cancer) therapeutics. Compared with protein-ligand or protein-protein systems, protein-aptamer complexes are under-represented in public structural databases, and aptamers themselves are highly flexible and relatively large molecules. These characteristics present distinct challenges for AI-based structural modeling. Here, we systematically evaluate recent AI frameworks, including AlphaFold3, Chai-1, Boltz-2, and RoseTTAFold2NA, along with a template-based approach, in predicting protein-aptamer complex structures and estimating binding free energies. We establish an independent benchmark to assess their performance in structural accuracy, stability, and energetic consistency. This study provides a foundation for the application of AI in aptamer drug design and offers a reference framework for future research in nucleic-acid therapeutics and biomolecular modeling.

Indexed as

Aptamers, NucleotideArtificial IntelligenceProteinsDrug DesignModels, MolecularProtein BindingAptamers, NucleotideProteinsAI-based structure predictionaptamer specificitybenchmarkingMD simulationsprotein–aptamer complexes

Identifiers

PMID42080590
PMCPMC13137337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.