ArticleThe journal of vascular access2026
Peripherally inserted central catheter performance in oncology patients: A retrospective analysis in an outpatient setting.
Article in The journal of vascular access, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPeripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are increasingly used in outpatient oncology care, with nurses playing a central role in management. This study aimed to describe PICC use, maintenance, and complication patterns in this setting.
methodsSingle-center retrospective study conducted at the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori. Adult patients with a PICC and at least one outpatient visit for PICC management between 1 January 2024 and 1 January 2025 were eligible.
resultsTwo hundred and thirty-one patients were included (mean age 58.5 years, SD ±16.4). Catheter removal was predominantly planned after treatment completion. Unplanned removals were uncommon and mainly related to complications, including suspected infection, occlusion, thrombosis, or accidental dislodgement. The estimated PICC survival probability was 95.1% at 6 months and 89.0% at 12 months.
conclusionsIn outpatient oncology patients, PICCs showed sustained functionality, with removal mainly related to treatment completion, supporting continuity-based routine follow-up and tailored surveillance in clinically stable patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.