Trial reportFuture oncology (London, England)2026
Impact of
Trial report in Future oncology (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04083235 (An Open-label, Randomised, Multicentre, Phase III Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection, Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects Who Have Not Previously Received Chemotherapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open-label, Randomised, Multicentre, Phase III Study of Irinotecan Liposome Injection, Oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil/Leucovorin Versus Nab-paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Subjects Who Have Not Previously Received Chemotherapy for Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- NALIRIFOX versus FOLFIRINOX: reconstructed individual patient data meta-analysis of efficacy and safety in first-line treatment of unresectable or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- NALIRIFOX in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an exploratory analysis of real-world data.ESMO open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo evaluate the effect of
methodsThis pre-specified exploratory analysis evaluated safety outcomes by
resultsAmong 749 treated patients, 83 were homozygous for
conclusionsCLINICAL
trial registrationwww.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT04083235; EudraCT 2018-003585-14.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.