Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080290›Full record

ReviewActa physiologica (Oxford, England)2026

What Is the StartReact Effect?

Anthony N Carlsen, Dana Maslovat

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta physiologica (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anthony N CarlsenSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6015-8991
Dana MaslovatSchool of Human Kinetics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4383-6046

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 2023-04138
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of a startling acoustic stimulus during a simple reaction time task results in the rapid initiation of a prepared response at extremely short latencies (< 80 ms). This so-called "StartReact effect" has been increasingly employed to probe subcortical contributions to response preparation, as it is thought to occur due to increased activation in reticulospinal pathways associated with engagement of the startle reflex. However, the lack of an agreed-upon definition of what exactly constitutes a StartReact effect, combined with differences in methodological protocols, has resulted in inconsistent interpretation of experimental results. Based on a comprehensive review of the literature, including evidence for the physiological mechanism underlying the effect, we propose that the clearest definition of the StartReact effect is "the early and involuntary triggering of a prepared movement in the presence of a startle reflex". Reflexive startle activity has been shown to be strongly associated with involuntary response initiation and avoids other potential confounding variables that have been shown to speed reaction time. Here we argue that classification of trials based on startle-related activation in sternocleidomastoid is the most robust method to confirm a StartReact effect. Special situations, such as pre-pulse inhibition, movements involving musculature that require additional considerations, and lowered response preparation levels, are also considered with regards to how to confirm the presence of a StartReact effect. Future directions, including the use of a StartReact protocol as a potential adjuvant therapy for movement disorders, are discussed.

Indexed as

Reaction TimeReflex, StartleAcoustic StimulationAnimalsHumansMovementmotor preparationreaction timereticulospinalstartleStartReact

Identifiers

PMID42080290
PMCPMC13137407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.