Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080219›Full record

ArticleEpilepsia2026

Current management of low-grade, epilepsy-associated brain tumors in Europe.

Alexis Arzimanoglou, Sébile Tchaicha, Belén Trebino Harrington, Angelika Mühlebner, Imad Najm, Ingmar Blümcke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alexis ArzimanoglouEpilepsy Unit, Pediatric Neurology Department, coordinator of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7233-2771
Sébile TchaichaCoordination Team, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1939-6828
Belén Trebino HarringtonCoordination Team, European Reference Network EpiCARE, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Angelika MühlebnerDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9102-7353
Imad NajmEpilepsy Center, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5192-2089
Ingmar BlümckeInstitute of Neuropathology, University Hospitals Erlangen, member of European Reference Network EpiCARE, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8676-0788

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low-grade epilepsy-associated brain tumors (LEATs) are a frequent cause of drug-resistant focal epilepsy in both children and adults. Epilepsy surgery is a well-recognized treatment option, with almost 80% of patients being seizure-free at 1 year, and 50% of children being seizure- and drug-free at 5 years. Despite these outcomes, standardized management guidelines remain lacking. The present study aimed to assess current practices in Europe. A comprehensive web-based survey was conducted by EpiCARE (European Reference Network for Rare and Complex Epilepsies). Responses were collected from 172 clinicians representing 75 institutions in 26 European region countries. The questionnaire addressed institutional protocols, individual practices, referral pathways, presurgical evaluation, histopathology, molecular diagnostics, and follow-up. Clinicians largely agreed that epileptic seizures are a major comorbidity in LEAT patients, and most reported that seizure frequency and duration influence their treatment approach. This reflects an understanding of LEATs not only as an oncological entity, but above all as an epileptogenic lesion with a strong impact on quality of life, systematically requiring a multidisciplinary approach. Significant inconsistencies were identified, particularly regarding referral pathways, presurgical assessment (66% referred systematically to an epilepsy team), and molecular diagnostics. Only 48% of respondents reported having institutional protocols in place. Although the majority supported early referral to an epilepsy surgery team after diagnosis (even in the absence of confirmed drug resistance), 13% still required failure of at least two antiseizure medications. Long-term postsurgical follow-up was recommended by 89% of clinicians beyond 1 year after surgery. Almost all clinicians acknowledged that histopathology influenced clinical decision-making for follow-up, and 87.2% were familiar with the World Health Organization 2021 central nervous system tumor classification and molecular diagnostics. This large European study shows growing alignment with international recommendations, but significant inconsistencies remain in clinical practice, particularly regarding referral pathways, presurgical assessment, and molecular diagnostics. These findings highlight the need for consensus-driven international guidelines for LEAT management.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDrug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyPractice Patterns, Physicians'AdultChildEuropeHumansReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnairesclinical practiceepilepsy surgeryEuropean Reference Network EpiCAREmolecular diagnosticsmultidisciplinary managementWHO 2021 CNS tumor classification

Identifiers

PMID42080219
PMCPMC13525574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.