ArticleiScience2026
Coordination costs may counteract the positive effects of a larger group size in determining the winner of between-group conflicts.
Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Collective defense of territories and resources is a key benefit of group living and is often modeled as a public goods game. Although larger animal groups have the potential to mobilize greater fighting power in between-group competition, this advantage may be constrained by coordination. Our review of quantitative studies shows that, independent of a population's average group size, larger groups usually win, with few exceptions. We examined one such case in vervet monkeys. As expected, group size was positively correlated with group spatial spread, and more dispersed groups were less likely to win encounters, implicating coordination problems. We then developed a mathematical model showing that, as coordination costs rise with group size due to spatial spread, they can cancel the usual "strength in numbers" advantage of larger groups in between-group conflicts. Our work highlights how between-group competition provides a natural setting for integrating ecological constraints into models of N-player cooperation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.