Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42080126›Full record

ArticleAnthrozoos2022

A Cross-Species Examination of Pro-White Color Bias Using a Novel Implicit Association Test.

Jennifer A Coleman, Camilla W Nonterah, Jennifer A Joy-Gaba, Curtis Phills, Kristen C Jacobson

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Anthrozoos, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jennifer A ColemanDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Camilla W NonterahDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Jennifer A Joy-GabaDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Curtis PhillsDepartment of Psychology, University of North Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
Kristen C JacobsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

A Pilot Study of the Effects of Interactions with Therapy Dogs on Child Stress ResponsivityR21HD094956 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JACOBSON, KRISTEN C. · 2018 to 2019
$451k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD094956
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is abundant evidence for pro-White color bias across the social psychology literature. In human-animal interaction work, black dog syndrome (BDS) refers to preference toward lighter-colored dogs over black dogs, leading to differences in rates of euthanasia and adoption. BDS has received mixed support in prior studies. Results from studies examining explicit color preference toward animals are also inconsistent. Numerous studies report strong support for implicit pro-White bias toward humans, but no studies have examined implicit pro-White bias toward animals. Thus, the primary aim of the current research was to test for implicit pro-White bias across various stimuli and species, using both novel and well-established Implicit Association Tests (IATs). In study 1 (

Indexed as

Biasblack dog syndromehuman–animal interactionImplicit Association Testrace

Identifiers

PMID42080126
PMCPMC13132499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.