ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Early Identification of Endometrial Malignancy in Postmenopausal Women with Asymptomatic Endometrial Thickening: A Novel Explainable Machine Learning Model.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Early screening and management of asymptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickening are essential to optimize diagnosis and treatment outcomes. However, no unified intervention standards or predictive models for high-risk subgroups exist. This study aimed to develop and validate a SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-based machine learning (ML) model to identify key risk factors for non-benign lesions in this population. Methods: Enrolled in this retrospective cohort were 1031 asymptomatic postmenopausal women with endometrial thickening (≥ 5 mm) who underwent hysteroscopy at International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 1, 2017, to July 31, 2025. This study comprehensively compiled 33 candidate predictors from accessible clinical datasets, covering demographic characteristics, disease attributes, transvaginal ultrasound results, and laboratory data. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was adopted for feature selection. Eight machine learning methods (Logistic Regression, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, XGBoost, LightGBM, Naive Bayes, LDA, QDA) were leveraged to construct the model. Outcome interpretation was performed with the SHAP method, and a dynamic online nomogram was created to support clinical practice. Results: Parity, endometrial thickness (ET), mean platelet volume (MPV), platelet distribution width (PDW), and D-dimer were identified as independent risk factors. An online nomogram built upon these variables facilitated the real-time prediction of endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH)/ endometrial carcinoma (EC). Among eight machine learning models, the Gradient Boosting model achieved the superior performance, with an AUC of 0.763 (95% CI: 0.640-0.865), accuracy of 0.791, sensitivity of 0.667, and specificity of 0.805. Visualized interpretation at the individual patient level was achieved using the SHAP force plot. Conclusion: We proposed a robust and interpretable ML-driven strategy for EAH/EC risk assessment in postmenopausal women with asymptomatic endometrial thickening. The model demonstrated superior predictive performance and feasibility for population-wide screening, serving as an efficient tool for the risk stratification of early endometrial malignancy prior to surgery and thus preventing overtreatment in low-risk individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.