ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Identifying key bioprocess variables using explainable machine learning to enhance culture efficiency and viability of umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (UC-MSCs) are promising for regenerative medicine, but consistent manufacturing quality is critical. Objective: To develop and interpret machine-learning models (Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), with Shapley Additive Explanations, SHAP) that identify facilitatory and inhibitory factors affecting UC-MSC culture duration and post-processing viability. Methods: We analyzed data from 203 UC-MSC manufacturing cases. Candidate predictors included neonatal characteristics (e.g., sex, delivery mode), processing timelines, medium composition, cell features, and operator-related factors. Performance was evaluated using accuracy, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), the area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), log loss, and Brier score, with calibration assessed in cross-validation. Results: For predicting shorter culture duration (defined as a time interval between UC collection and the completion of cryopreservation of <600 h), the model achieved accuracy = 0.80, AUROC = 0.72, and log loss = 0.55; cross-validation yielded AUROC = 0.68, AUPRC = 0.81, and Brier score = 0.20 with good calibration. For predicting higher cell viability, the model achieved accuracy = 0.71, AUROC = 0.72, and log loss = 0.62; cross-validation yielded AUROC = 0.54, AUPRC = 0.58, and Brier score = 0.26. SHAP analysis indicated that shorter culture duration was most associated with medium composition, processing time, and delivery mode, whereas higher viability was linked to neonatal sex, operator identity, and processing time. Sensitivity analyses showed stable top-ranked features across decision-threshold shifts and after removing operator identity. Conclusions: An interpretable XGBoost+SHAP pipeline is effective for identifying process-critical drivers of UC-MSC culture duration. While current predictive precision for cell viability remains limited, the framework functions as a robust diagnostic tool for elucidating qualitative trends. By exploiting these insights, the model facilitates targeted optimization of media selection, timeline control, and standard operating procedures (SOPs), ultimately enhancing manufacturing quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.