ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Effects of Ranolazine on Vascular Adrenergic Receptors in Rabbit Aorta.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Different mechanisms of action have been proposed for Ranolazine (Rn), mainly the inhibition of the late sodium current and antagonism of α₁-adrenergic receptors. In the present study, we evaluated the possible involvement of other adrenergic receptors, specifically α₂, β₂, and β₃, as mediators of the vascular effects of Rn. Methods: Segments of rabbit aorta were mounted in an organ bath. Electrical field stimulation (EFS; 2, 4, and 8 Hz) induced frequency-dependent contractions that were abolished by tetrodotoxin, prazosin, or guanethidine (10⁻⁶ M), confirming the neural origin of the vascular responses. The effects of Rn on vascular responses to adrenergic stimulation were evaluated by incubating the preparations with increasing concentrations of the drug (10⁻⁷-10⁻⁴ M) for 20 minutes prior to neural stimulation (4 Hz). The involvement of α₁-, α₂-, β₂-, or β₃-adrenergic receptors was assessed using specific antagonists (10⁻⁶ M): prazosin (α₁), yohimbine (α₂), butaxamine (β₂), and SR59230A (β₃). Subsequently, the sequence of electrical field stimulations was performed in the presence of Rn. Expression levels of α₁-, α₂-, β₂-, and β₃-adrenergic receptors were determined by Western blot analysis. Results: Rn decreases the contractile effect induced by adrenergic nerve stimulation in the rabbit aorta. In the presence of prazosin or yohimbine, the vasoconstrictor response was significantly reduced. However, incubation with butaxamine or SR59230A significantly increased the contractile response to adrenergic nerve stimulation. The protein expression of α Conclusion: Rn inhibits the vasoconstrictor response to adrenergic nerve stimulation through an antagonistic effect on α
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.