ArticleBiomedical engineering letters2026
A comprehensive system for eyelid analysis using deep learning: automated measurement of eyelid position and corneal exposure.
Article in Biomedical engineering letters, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantitative eyelid analysis is crucial for diagnosing and managing eyelid disorders, such as ptosis, and for surgical planning. However, traditional manual measurements of Marginal Reflex Distance (MRD) and Corneal Exposure Ratio are often error-prone and inconsistent. Existing deep learning approaches using RGB imaging face challenges in accurately delineating eye structures due to insufficient contrast and varying iris pigmentation. This study introduces a comprehensive system integrating infrared (IR) imaging with deep learning-based eye segmentation to overcome these limitations. The system utilizes an IR camera with facial rotation compensation for consistent image acquisition and employs deep learning algorithms optimized for IR imaging characteristics. A dataset of 2,121 IR images from 303 patients (internal validation) and 406 public dataset images (external validation) was used. Multiple models including RITnet and SegFormer were evaluated, with data augmentation techniques applied to improve performance. SegFormer with data augmentation demonstrated the highest performance, achieving mean IoU of 0.9325 for internal validation and 0.9288 for external validation. Our automated system achieved improved precision compared to manual measurements, with MRD1 MSE of 0.362±0.511 mm and MRD2 MSE of 0.286±0.324 mm. This proposed system offers a robust, efficient, and standardized approach for quantitative eyelid analysis, leveraging IR imaging advantages to address the shortcomings of conventional assessment methods and providing clinical-grade accuracy for automated eyelid parameter measurement. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13534-025-00546-9.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.