One Health in the public mind: Narrative constructions of zoonotic spillovers.

Elizabeth A Shanahan, Xin Han, Sarah Salam, Savanna Washburn, Sally K Slipher

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elizabeth A ShanahanDepartment of Political Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Xin HanDepartment of Political Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Sarah SalamDepartment of Political Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Savanna WashburnDepartment of Political Science, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Sally K SlipherSocial Data Collection and Analysis Services, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic heightened global attention to the One Health (OH) framework-a multisectoral, multidisciplinary approach that integrates human, animal, and environmental health to address challenges such as zoonotic spillovers. While OH has gained traction in scientific and policy arenas, little is known about how the public understands OH issues. Such problem definitions matter because they are theorized to align with logical, congruent solutions. This study examines (1) how often people identify OH dimensions (human, animal, environment) when defining zoonotic spillovers; (2) whether narrative content varies between whole and partial OH definitions; and (3) whether narrative content is congruent with their problem definitions. Based on a survey from residents of eastern coastal Australia (

Indexed as

Health policyHuman–animal–environment interactionNarrative Policy FrameworkOne HealthProblem definitionZoonotic spillover

Identifiers

PMID42080031

DOI10.1016/j.onehlt.2026.101411

PMCPMC13133971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.