ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2026
Comparison of UNIQ and classic unipolar electrodes in TECAR therapy for low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] Low back pain (LBP) affects millions worldwide and frequently becomes chronic, diminishing quality of life. TECAR therapy is a non-invasive intervention that applies radiofrequency currents to heat tissues, reduce spasms, and enhance circulation. This study aimed to evaluate a novel electrode integrating resistive and capacitive mechanisms to determine its efficacy in managing LBP with TECAR therapy. [Participants and Methods] Fifty-two patients were assessed at baseline (T0) and after a 2-week treatment period (T1) and received TECAR therapy with either a conventional electrode or the UNIQ electrode. Pain intensity was measured with the Visual Analogue Scale, lumbar mobility by active range of motion in flexion and extension, and disability using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. [Results] The treated group showed ΔVAS values of -6.00 ± 1.50 cm compared with -3.17 ± 1.85 cm in the control group. For lumbar range of motion, ΔROM was -1.75 ± 0.87 in the treated group and -1.16 ± 1.27 in the control group. Disability scores were -11.47 ± 4.81 in the treated group and -5.53 ± 4.21 in the control group. [Conclusion] These findings indicate that combining resistive and capacitive electrodes may increase the therapeutic effectiveness of TECAR therapy for managing low back pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.