ArticleJTCVS open2026
Myocardial perfusion improvement of saphenous vein Y-composite versus aortocoronary grafts during the first year after surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study was conducted to compare improvements in myocardial perfusion between Y-composite and aortocoronary configurations during 1 year after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Of 311 off-pump CABG patients using the saphenous vein as Y-composite (composite group) or aortocoronary (aorta group) graft, 204 patients who underwent myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography during the preoperative period, at 3 months after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery were enrolled. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 43 matched sets with 86 composite and 43 aortocoronary patients were compared. Based on a 17-segment model, the degree of perfusion impairment for each segment was evaluated semiquantitatively via a reversibility score, which was defined as rest minus stress perfusion values. The improvement in perfusion was evaluated based on the temporal changes in reversibility scores and was compared using a linear mixed model. Results: Of 2193 segments, 795 segments (518 and 277 segments in composite and aorta groups, respectively) demonstrated a significant decrease in perfusion on preoperative myocardial single-photon emission computed tomography and were successfully revascularized by CABG. Median (quartile 1, quartile 3) preoperative reversibility scores in the ischemic segments were 7 (4, 13) and 7 (4, 12) in composite and aorta groups, respectively ( Conclusions: Myocardial perfusion improvement during the first year after CABG was not significantly different between Y-composite and aortocoronary configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.