ArticleJTCVS open2026
Validation of current mortality risk prediction models in patients with cirrhosis undergoing cardiac surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cardiac Surgery Management in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Liver cirrhosis is a known risk factor for mortality after cardiac surgery. In this study, we investigated the correlation between existing prediction models and actual mortality rates after cardiac surgery. Methods: Between July 2014 and December 2022, 1257 patients with a history of chronic liver disease underwent cardiac surgery, of whom 220 had a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Preoperative comorbidities, intraoperative details, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. The Mayo Clinic and VOCAL-Penn scores were applied to the 220 patients and compared to observed mortality. Results: Among the 220 patients with cirrhosis, the preoperative median MELD score was 10. According to the Mayo Clinic score, the mean predicted mortality rate was 20.9% at 30 days and 29.6% at 90 days. In contrast, according to the VOCAL-Penn score, the mean predicted mortality rate was 9.0% at 30 days and 14.0% at 90 days, whereas the observed postoperative mortality of the 220 patients was 4.1% at 30 days and 12.6% at 90 days. VOCAL-Penn showed good calibration but still overestimated mortality by 3% at 30 days and by 1.3% at 90 days. The Mayo Clinic score demonstrated weak calibration, overestimating mortality by 15% at 30 days and by 17% at 90 days. Conclusions: In this single-center analysis, the Mayo Clinic and VOCAL-Penn scores overestimated the postoperative mortality in patients with cirrhosis undergoing cardiac surgery, although VOCAL-Penn provided a more accurate risk prediction. Ultimately, this heterogeneous group of patients often presents with a wide range of comorbidities, which complicate risk stratification; however, patients should not be denied surgery solely on the basis of current risk prediction models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.