ArticleJTCVS open2026
Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in symptomatic patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation and prior heart valve surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tricuspid valve surgery for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) following prior valve surgery carries increased risk. This study evaluated 2-year outcomes of tricuspid transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (T-TEER) in patients with severe TR and prior valve surgery. Methods: TRILUMINATE Pivotal is an international randomized trial comparing T-TEER with the TriClip (device group) to medical therapy (control group) in patients with symptomatic severe TR, with a concurrent single-arm cohort (device) for anatomically complex patients. Echocardiograms were assessed in a core laboratory, and outcomes were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. Results: Among the 469 patients in the device group, 113 had prior valve surgery and 356 did not. Baseline characteristics were comparable in the 2 groups: mean age, 77 years versus 79 years; female sex, 64% versus 59%; atrial fibrillation, 87% versus 86%; and heart failure hospitalization (HFH) within 1 year prior to T-TEER, 26% versus 25%. The T-TEER success rate was 99% in both groups, with no in-hospital deaths, a median hospital stay of 1 day, and 97% discharged home. Thirty-day adverse event rates were low and similar: rates of all-cause mortality, stroke, and new pacemaker implantation were all <2%, and the rate of major bleeding was <4%. At 2 years, outcomes remained favorable and comparable: ≤ moderate TR was achieved in 81% versus 80% ( Conclusions: In patients with prior valve surgery, T-TEER was safe and resulted in significant TR reduction and symptom improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.