ArticleJTCVS open2026
Redo total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk for patients with previous proximal aortic replacement for acute type A dissection.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The extent of arch replacement for aortic dissection remains controversial. The natural history of a residually dissected arch remains unknown, and the morbidity of arch reintervention in these settings is understudied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate outcomes of redo total arch replacement in patients who had previous proximal aortic repair for acute type A dissection. Methods: In total, 79 consecutive patients underwent redo total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk after previous type A dissection repair. Surgical outcomes were obtained from the institutional database and the electronic medical record was reviewed for follow-up outcomes. Results: The median time between type A repair and redo total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk was 4.25 [2.05, 7.78] years. The most common comorbidity was hypertension in 76 of 79 (96.2%), and 14 of 79 (17.7%) had previous cerebrovascular disease. The median crossclamp and circulatory arrest times (minutes) were 78 [61, 108] and 18 [14, 25], respectively. The operative mortality rate was 3 in 79 (3.8%), the postoperative stroke rate was 7 of in (8.9%), and the paraplegia rate was 4 in 79 (5.1%). The 1-year survival was 93.5% (88.1%-99.2%), and the 3-year cumulative incidence of aortic reintervention was 53.1% (38.3%-65.8%). In total, 35 patients required distal aortic reintervention, including 19 distal thoracic endovascular aortic repair extensions, and 5 open thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs. Conclusions: Redo total arch replacement after previous proximal aortic repair for acute type A dissection can be performed safely at an experienced aortic referral center.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.