Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079921›Full record

ArticleJTCVS open2026

Type-entry-malperfusion classification in a 13-year cohort of surgically treated type A acute aortic syndromes: Impact on planning and outcomes.

Jacques Tomasi, Pierre Escrig, Jean Philippe Verhoye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jacques TomasiDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Pierre EscrigDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.
Jean Philippe VerhoyeDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pontchaillou University Hospital, Rennes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The Stanford classification helps rapidly triage patients with type A acute aortic syndrome, but it overlooks key elements like proximal entry tear and malperfusion. The newer type, entry, malperfusion classification addresses these gaps to improve management. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study of all patients operated for type A acute aortic syndrome between 2010 and 2023. Results: Among 334 included patients, hospital mortality was 16.5%. Entry tear was located in the ascending aorta in 69%, the arch in 19%, and the descending aorta in 3.6%. Malperfusion occurred in 75% of patients; 35% had at least 1 clinical malperfusion. Arch or distal entry tears were significantly associated with more extensive arch resections. Coronary malperfusion led to more associated procedures (coronary artery bypass grafting, reimplantation), more frequent root replacements (M1-), and greater extracorporeal life support use (M1+). Clinical malperfusions were associated with greater mortality and complication rates. Patients who were M3+ displayed the most severe multiorgan complications. Conclusions: The type, entry, malperfusion classification offers valuable preoperative insights, helping to anticipate surgical strategy and identify high-risk patients. However, its ability to differentiate malperfusion severity remains limited.

Indexed as

acute aortic syndromeTEM classificationtype A dissection

Identifiers

PMID42079921
PMCPMC13131170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.