ArticleJTCVS open2026
Imaging predictors of pleural response in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- On the interpretation of pleural clearance in imaging pathology correlation studies.JTCVS open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between imaging and pathologic findings after systemic therapy in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with pleural involvement remains unclear. Morphologic and metabolic imaging changes may predict pleural clearance and inform further treatment decisions. Methods: We reviewed 24 patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer and initial pleural involvement who underwent subsequent pulmonary resection between 2016 and 2025. Baseline and preoperative computed tomography and positron emission tomography-computed tomography scans were assessed for primary, nodal, metastatic, and pleural disease. Residual pleural disease (RPD) was defined by pathologically or cytologically confirmed tumor; undetectable pleural disease (UPD) was defined by absence of gross disease or negative tissue/cytology when available. Major pathologic response (≤10% viable tumor) was assessed in the primary tumor. Results: Seventeen patients (70.8%) had UPD and 7 (29.2%) had RPD. Patients with UPD had greater rates of major pathologic response in the primary tumor (52.9% vs 0%), complete radiologic response of the primary tumor (64.7% vs 0%, Conclusions: Complete radiologic or metabolic response of the primary and nodal sites strongly correlates with UPD at surgery. Residual pleural disease on imaging should not preclude consideration for surgical consolidation. These findings underscore the potential utility of refined, evidence-based imaging criteria to guide multidisciplinary decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.