ArticleJTCVS open2026
Machine learning in critical care: Improving prediction of mortality and intensive care unit stay after cardiac surgery.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The European System for Cardiac Operation Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II) is a multifactorial tool that assesses postoperative mortality risk after cardiac surgery but lacks several patient-specific and procedure-related factors. This study evaluated machine learning (ML) models against the EuroSCORE II for predicting in-hospital mortality and prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay after cardiac surgery. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, data from 5606 adult patients undergoing primary open-heart surgery were analyzed. Six ML models were compared with EuroSCORE II using area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) analysis for mortality and ICU length-of-stay predictions using a specified set of pre- and perioperative parameters. Feature importance for each prediction task was assessed using the random forest classifier. Results: Coronary artery bypass grafting was the most common procedure (50.2%), followed by aortic valve (20.7%), mitral valve (16.4%), thoracic aorta (8.8%), tricuspid valve (0.7%), and other procedures (3.1%). EuroSCORE II predicted a 2.26% mortality rate, whereas the actual in-hospital mortality was 1.5% (83 patients). The Gaussian Process (GP) classifier surpassed EuroSCORE II for prediction of in-hospital mortality with AUROC values of 0.877 versus 0.851 using preoperative data, reaching 0.886 when perioperative data were included. For prolonged ICU stay prediction, the GP classifier achieved AUROCs of 0.725 (preoperative data) and 0.749 (perioperative data). Conclusions: EuroSCORE II overestimated mortality despite a robust performance. Among tested ML models, the GP classifier demonstrated superior accuracy using preoperative data, further enhanced by perioperative parameters. Our results highlight ML's potential for improving risk assessment by its integration into next-generation cardiac surgery risk assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.