ArticleJTCVS open2026
Retrograde perfusion of the dorsalis pedis artery versus traditional distal perfusion catheter use in venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.
Article in JTCVS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adults with cardiogenic shock.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Limb ischemia is a persistent problem in femoral venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO), with clinically significant adverse events and/or poor outcomes occurring in 10% to 70% of patients. The Extracorporeal Life Support Organization recommends the use of a distal perfusion catheter (DPC), but in patients in whom proximal femoral artery access is challenging or no longer viable, a more distal DPC placement may be necessary. Using a dynamic mock flow loop of adult femoral VA-ECMO, we investigated the hemodynamic feasibility of retrograde dorsalis pedis artery DPC placement versus traditional DPC placement. Methods: An adult femoral VA-ECMO dynamic mock flow loop was tuned to heart failure conditions. An ECMO circuit (Affinity pump with Eurosets oxygenator, 15-Fr arterial cannula in the right common femoral artery, 25-Fr contralateral venous cannula, and 6-Fr pediatric arterial cannula as DPC) was integrated into the loop. Two configurations were tested: (1) traditional anterograde DPC (right superficial femoral artery); (2) retrograde DPC of the right dorsalis pedis artery. Hemodynamic data were collected at baseline (ECMO circuit clamped) and with ECMO support at 0-3000 rpm. Results: Retrograde dorsalis pedis perfusion provided distal limb hemodynamics (pressures, flows) comparable with traditional DPC placement. DPC flow (367 mL/min), right-left limb flow balance ratio, and distal limb pulsatility were comparable with both approaches while maintaining equivalent ECMO and central flows (aortic, venous). The dorsalis DPC provided retrograde flow up the right superficial femoral artery to the proximal limb (147 mL/min) and anterograde flow down the tibioperoneal trunk (252 mL/min). Conclusions: Traditional anterograde DPC is not always feasible in patients with hematoma, obesity, infection, severe peripheral vasculopathy, and/or anatomical variation. We demonstrated experimentally that retrograde DPC of the dorsalis pedis artery may be a viable hemodynamic alternative to traditional DPC placement in femoral VA-ECMO to prevent distal limb ischemia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.