Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079811›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics advances2026

An optimization framework for hierarchical clustering.

Gal Gilad, Roded Sharan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gal GiladSchool of Computer Science and AI, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1913-8918
Roded SharanSchool of Computer Science and AI, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8363-4882

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motivation: Hierarchical clustering is a fundamental problem in computational biology, with popular greedy heuristics such as average linkage dating back to the 1950s but no well-defined objective. Recently, a combinatorial optimization criterion for the problem was suggested by Dasgupta. While minimizing this criterion is NP-hard, the popular average linkage method serves as a strong baseline. Nevertheless, its myopic, greedy nature frequently leads to structurally suboptimal hierarchies. Results: To remedy this, we introduce a novel average-linkage-based clustering approach that combines local and global considerations by generating multiple views of the input data and learning how to blend them into an integrated similarity measure. We demonstrate that our method, DOMUS, consistently outperforms strong baselines, including a beam search heuristic, on a wide range of synthetic and classic benchmark datasets. Furthermore, we validate its real-world applicability through a rigorous benchmark on single-cell RNA sequencing data, where it compares favorably with the state-of-the-art HiDeF algorithm. Availability and implementation: The DOMUS framework is implemented in Python and freely available at https://github.com/GalGilad/DOMUS.

Identifiers

PMID42079811
PMCPMC13128330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.