Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079760›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology advances

Patient preferences for incidental findings in a genomic trial: Insights from the Copenhagen glioblastoma cohort.

Anders Overby Sjøstrøm, Maria Camilla Mathiasen, Ulrik Lassen, Karin Piil, Dorte Schou Nørøxe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anders Overby SjøstrømDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7500-2715
Maria Camilla MathiasenDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0967-0273
Ulrik LassenDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3865-4574
Karin PiilDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7972-4674
Dorte Schou NørøxeDepartment of Oncology, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9921-8277

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) patients often face cognitive impairment, which may limit their capacity to comprehend complex trial information, particularly regarding genomic analyses and incidental findings. We analyzed consent forms from a genomic study, including 108 newly diagnosed grade 4 GBM patients in the Danish Glioblastoma Cohort (2016-2019) undergoing whole-exome sequencing. Of 110 patients, 108 (98.2%) consented. Preferences for incidental findings varied: 31% chose no information, 22% actionable findings only, and 42% all information. Despite the complexity, participation was high, suggesting that GBM patients are willing and able to participate in genomic research when flexible consent options are offered.

Identifiers

PMID42079760
PMCPMC13134381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.