Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42079750›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026

A nomogram for predicting ARDS progression and need for invasive ventilation in COVID-19 patients using plasma hyaluronic acid and clinical scores.

Genhua Mu, Zhihao Nie, Yuan Xue, Shanshan Hou, Songping Xie, Chun Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Genhua Mu *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Zhihao Nie *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Yuan Xue *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Yancheng No.1 People's Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of the Medical School, Nanjing University, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Shanshan HouPharmacy Department, Yancheng No. 1 People's Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of the Medical School, Nanjing University, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Songping XieDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Chun PanDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a major complication in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Early identification of patients at increased risk of ARDS progression and invasive ventilation remains clinically important. This study aimed to investigate whether plasma hyaluronic acid (HA), alone or in combination with established clinical severity scores, could help identify ARDS, stratify severe disease, and assess the risk of endotracheal intubation in patients with COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective single-center cohort study included 502 adult patients with COVID-19 admitted between September 2022 and February 2023. Plasma HA levels were measured within 24 hours after admission. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, laboratory findings, clinical severity scores, and outcome data were collected. Receiver operating characteristic analysis, multivariable logistic regression, and nomogram construction were used to evaluate the association of HA with ARDS diagnosis, severe ARDS stratification, and intubation risk. Results: This retrospective cohort analysis of 502 COVID-19 patients (361 in the non-ARDS group and 141 in the ARDS group) identified plasma hyaluronic acid (HA) as a potential biomarker for early ARDS diagnosis, severity stratification, and intubation risk assessment. HA levels were positively correlated with disease severity, with concentrations significantly increasing alongside ARDS severity, and showed good discrimination for ARDS (AUC = 0.904; sensitivity 81.6%, specificity 87.5% at a cut-off of 103 μg/L). HA also demonstrated excellent discrimination for severe ARDS, with an AUC of 0.953, comparable to that of the APACHE II and SOFA scores. It also showed good discrimination for endotracheal intubation risk in the overall cohort. The AUC for predicting intubation requirement reached 0.890 (sensitivity 76.6%, specificity 90.8%, NPV = 95.5% at a cut-off value of 140.1 μg/L). Integrating HA with clinical scores further improved model performance; incorporating age, lymphocyte count, CRP, CK, APACHE II, and SOFA into the baseline model increased the AUC for predicting severe ARDS from 0.960 to 0.973 (ΔAUC = 0.013). Furthermore, multivariable regression analysis showed that HA was independently associated with ARDS diagnosis (OR = 1.04, P = 0.007), severe ARDS (OR = 1.00, P < 0.001), and intubation risk (OR = 1.00, P = 0.011). Conclusion: Plasma HA was positively associated with ARDS severity and intubation risk in patients with COVID-19. HA may serve as a complementary biomarker for early risk stratification, particularly when used in combination with established clinical severity scores.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hyaluronic AcidNomogramsRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeAdultAgedBiomarkersDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesROC CurveBiomarkersHyaluronic Acidacute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)COVID-19hyaluronic acidinvasive ventilationnomogram

Identifiers

PMID42079750
PMCPMC13128578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.